Intelligence.Confidence.

Confidential AI for clinical trials.

We’re developing a trusted arbiter that computes on unblinded data and releases only pre-authorized signals, helping trial teams act sooner while protecting the blind.

Intelligence within a protected boundary A six by six grid of data cells inside a mint green boundary. A single controlled path carries an authorized result outside.

Protected computation

Controlled disclosure

Accountable action

The platform

Compute on the data.
Control what leaves.

Blinding, privacy and sponsor confidentiality protect trial integrity. Tauvera’s architecture brings approved computation inside those boundaries, alongside existing inference engines and trial systems.

01 / Verified environment

Attested enclaves

Trusted execution environments (TEEs) isolate sensitive computation. Remote attestation lets participants verify the approved software environment before releasing keys.

02 / Shared key control

Threshold cryptography

Shamir secret sharing splits decryption keys across independent parties. The design requires a threshold of shares, so no single party, including Tauvera, can unlock protected data alone.

03 / Pre-authorized work

AI inside the boundary

Agents analyze data and perform operational tasks within the enclave. A locked specification limits their work and the signals each recipient can receive.

Applications

One arbiter.
Four trial functions.

Our initial research will test whether the same protected core can support safety surveillance, interim readiness, arm-aware resupply and continuous data cleaning while limiting information leakage.

01 / Safety surveillance

Signals for human review

Monitor adverse events by treatment arm inside the enclave. Send designated reviewers a signal when a pre-specified threshold is crossed, without exposing arm-level data to blinded teams.

02 / Investigational-product resupply

Supply informed by actual demand

Use arm-level demand to calculate kit resupply, with controlled instructions sent directly to supply systems or through RTSM/IRT. Evaluate waste, stockouts, and disclosure together.

03 / Interim decision-readiness

Timing set by the data

Track accruing endpoint data by arm inside the enclave as adaptive, platform and event-driven designs make interim timing harder to forecast. Notify the independent statistician when pre-specified information thresholds are met, so analyses run when the evidence is ready rather than on projected dates.

04 / Pre-cut data cleaning

Clean continuously, cut on demand

Run risk-based checks on accruing trial data inside the enclave and route queries to sites without revealing treatment arm. Keep critical data analysis-ready so the DMC can convene on the statistician’s schedule, not after a pre-cut cleaning push.


Beyond these four: the same core extends to confidential eligibility screening and multi-sponsor platform trials.

People retain final authority. Safety, efficacy and trial-continuation decisions remain with authorized human reviewers.

Future applications: confidential eligibility screening and multi-sponsor platform trials.

Trial integrity by design

Authorized signals.
Traceable actions.

The proposed architecture connects existing data and operations systems through the trusted arbiter. Its audit design records each computation and output for authorized oversight, including FDA inspection. The design aligns with ICH E6(R3) risk-based quality management and 21 CFR Part 11 electronic-records requirements.

Proposed trial workflowIntegration and validation ahead

Approved inputs

Trial systems

  • EDCClinical and safety data
  • RTSM / IRTAssignments and inventory
  • SponsorsPermitted data and models

Tauvera

  • Attested TEEProtected execution
  • Shared key controlNo unilateral decryption
  • Restricted agentsPre-authorized tasks and outputs

Permitted outputs

Signals & actions

  • Statistician, DMC & safety reviewersThreshold and readiness alerts
  • Supply chain / RTSMApproved kit instructions
  • Sponsor oversightBlinded operational views
Disclosure is part of the evaluation.Our information-theoretic framework measures excess information leakage relative to a defined trial baseline, including what operational outputs may reveal.

Concept to prototype

Building the evidence.

Completed work includes the trusted-arbiter architecture, formal security specification, leakage framework, and drug-supply simulations demonstrating potential $10-$12 million per-trial savings for Investigational Product/study kits. Next: enclave implementation on commercial confidential-computing infrastructure, then prospective validation.

Meghan Dierks

Zhunping (Justin) Zhang

Collaborate with Tauvera

Protect the blind.
Advance the work.

We're seeking design partners for prospective validation: sponsors, CROs, biostatisticians and trial-technology teams.

contact@tauvera.com